Probation: Crime and P.o Officer Essay

Probation is the most common form of sorry sentencing in the United States. Probation is intend as a court ordered- deposition alternative in which an wrongdoer is placed under the control, supervision and cargon By a P.O officer. Do I speak up its fair for a defendant to assign guilty and take probation to avoid imprisonment? I think it depends on the seriousness of the horror and what the charges are. A person guttert invoke guilty of a crime unless it is offered by a prosecutor, and there is commonly a reason why it is offered. If one is re eithery innocent of a crime I dont see the reason why they would agree to maintain guilty and take probation. Pleading guilty and pickings probation is a good and bad idea at the same age because what if a person who is being convicted of a crime is really innocent, besides yet has no choice but to plead guilty average so they can skip the incarceration and lessen their sentence.I think its unsporting only when coming to someone who in circumstance did do the crime but yet was habituated the relegate of appeal guilty and taking probation to avoid prison sentence. I think it is unfair to the victims family because for example a man kills a contract and child but yet he was given the chance to plead guilty just so he can have a lesser time, it is unfair to the victims family because sweet justice did non prevail. I think that probation is a win or lose posture because when a person violate their probation they can be sent to remit to serve the rest of their time. When one is granted probation there are umpteen another(prenominal) rules that they have to follow one of these rules is to not commit any crime while they are on probation, if this rule is not satisfied by the offender they lead be sent to jail and also be charge for the newer offense which they will get additional years.The various factors that should be consider when granting probation is the offender criminal history. A person with no c riminal history has a way better chance of been given the chance to plead guilty and take probation than someone who has a far score criminal history. The judge also considers the nature of the current offense. For example a person convicted of chopping a person feet off is less likely to obligate probation than a person who was driving while intoxicated and no contingency was caused. Another thing to be considered is whether probation is particular in that particular case, and whether the function that the offender requires will be acquired while incarcerated or under probation and will they be harm to the community.There are many crimes in unexampled York City where probation is given like substance abuse Arson, robbery, harassment, criminal mischief, and many more crimes which are considered misdemeanor. I think that imprisonment should be considered for all of these except substance abused only when it is being abused by the offender instead of selling the drug itself. If th e offender sells the drug I think he falls under the category of imprisonment. All these offenses can lead to a more serious crime. People who commit these crimes should take place some months behind bars so they can learn a valued lesson instead of getting a slap on the stake by being able to plead guilty and be given probation. Everyone deserve a chance to change but only if they are innocent or a juvenile, for adults I think they should not be given probation or to plead guilty to crimes that they did actually commit.