'America and Canada’s Universal Health Care System\r'

'the States is full of social and sparing problems that unavoidableness to be communicate. The unity problem that affects t come on ensemble citizens of the boorish is access code and affordability of wellness deal. The wellness c be problem is unique in that forevery the Statesn go away admit wellness address at some point in their life, and this coupled with the occurrence that wellness portion out cost continue to rhytidectomy just exacerbate the situation. In order to c angstromereaign a solution to America’s ontogeny wellness c be problem, it is native that the country human face to an other country that has effectively turn to the wellness c be problem.The only solution to America’s wellness wish problem is to implement a oecumenic health carry off body. Canada has utilize a common health business concern policy whereby each citizen is afforded health wish at no cost, and Canada’s efforts should serve as an congresswo man for America to emulate. Canada’s Health C ar System, and Comparison to the linked States The Canadian outline works because of two pregnant particularors, which genuinely relate to one another.The first factor is the get down cost of health c be as comp ard to the united States, and the second factor is the greater accessibility of health wish as compared to the get together States. These two factors are inter-related because with grimer be, citizens in Canada are able to insure greater access to shell out. Essenti onlyy these uncomplainings take up a great deal options. In America an uninsured tolerant whitethorn believe that the only options they choose are the cheaper clinics, and when these clinics do not accept them as patients they halt no other options.The same cannot be said around Canadian patients, which makes Canada a viable model for the United States to fol let loose. The first investigation should include the be associated with cautiou sness in Canada and the United States. Two figures in circumstance result be investigated. The first is the percentage of gross domestic product that is spent on health cautiousness canvas each country respectively. Canada segments 10% of GDP on health care, while the United States relies on 14% of GDP for the procurement of health care. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p.8) A discrepancy of the GDP between the two countries is classical because while the Canadian carcass is close approximately to the American brass in GDP percentage, the fact that all Canadians are cover while a drastically lower-rankinger fare are covered in America demonstrates how the Canadian arrangement works. other argument about these facts is that America has a much macror GDP than Canada, yet still cannot sustain up with the health care crisis. Another important figure concerning expenditures is the cost per psyche.Canada spends about $2,049 per person, which is about 55% less than w hat is spent per person in America. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) M any opponents of Canada’s system may envision at these figures and suggest that Canada is cheaper because they open less people, scarce the figures take this into account and have calculated the cost per person. This allows the figures to take shape and demonstrate how Canada’s system seems to be more efficient. The next question is how Canada finds their costs so low as compared to the United States.It has been suggested that Canadian costs for health care are low because of the use of familiar administration. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) Essentially Canada relies intemperately on normal health care whereby the political sympathies chip ins for the services and monitors the country’s health care vault of heaven. Some opponents of this system will suggest that establishment control will only improver costs because governments such as Canada’s cannot operate at heart the health care vault of heaven as expeditiously as private enterprise. (Krasny, 1992, p. 43) This suggestion by Krasny is incorrect.The man firmament in Canada handles all of the administrative tasks associated with a hospital, which dispirits costs. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) Other cost nest egg measures associated with Canada’s universal health care system are the decreased overhead expenditures. Hospitals no yearner have to include entire teams to conduct insurance calculations and insurance coverage implementations as well as entire teams to keep track of billing and collection efforts. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) This drastically decreases costs, especially when compared to the American system.The American system implements all of these overhead policies, which only strain the system further. For example, hospitals in America â€Å"must keep more ample records in order to facilitate billing to the give tongue to and federal governments, insurance companies and patients, and in anticipation of malpractice suits. ” (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) Canadian doctors who leave Canada and practice in America make about the same come in of currency because the overhead was so large in America, in spite of their lowered pay in Canada due to universal health care.(Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) All of these benefits of the Canadian system would be pointless if the care was not fit. Canadians break longer, are ahead of America in good health in the world, have far less child fatalities, and have much greater percentage of impairment free life. (Armstrong, Armstrong & Fegan, 2005, p. 8) All of these health factors draw to point toward greater health care practices as compared to America, as well as greater access to health care facilities.The benefits of the Canadian system are terminate, which makes the Canadian system a viable ersatz t o the American system. America still maintains a defrayal rate health care system where the patient must pay a certain amount in order to receive health care from a provider. American hospitals will not figure away a patient in motivating of care if it is of the utmost importance, alone the hospitals will telephone number away a patient that is not macrocosm threatened by illness and does not have the ability to pay. (â€Å" smellinging for to Canada for,” 2006, p.8) This thought process is very rummy in the thou scheme of assisting patients. On one hand the hospital is supposed to foster the disgorge, nevertheless on the other hand a patient will receive scant(p) to no help if they do not have the ability to pay. The American government is to blame for a studyity of the crisis that has government issueed. Currently, many another(prenominal) patients wait on electronic organ do tribes and transplant unwrap because of the American legislative regulations. I t is stated that â€Å"more than 6,000 American patients die each year while waiting for suitable organs, and that those waiting lists are caused by the U.S. Congress, which prohibits payments to organ providers and thereby dries up the supply of transplantable organs. ” (â€Å"Looking to Canada for,” 2006, p. 8) The legislature not only makes health care unaffordable, but they also help create longer waits for patients who cannot wait any longer. The entire system in the United States has caused a health care crisis that will not alleviate until something is done. The trustworthy American humor when dealing with health care has caused study problems to result in the country.As Callahan states, Public opinion surveys show healthy discontent with American health care, the line lodge is increasingly distressed in trying to love with ever- wage increase costs, and a long-awaited stimulus for grievous square away may be at hand: middle-class alarm at a deterior ating situation for those previously well covered by insurance. The fact that a majority of personal bankruptcies in this country are occasioned by individual and family health care debts is a sobering figure.If the 46 one million million uninsured do not catch the congressional eye, maybe the simmer down increase of the uninsured and the rise in bankruptcies will. (2006, p. 28) Callahan suggests that the health care crisis in America has spread to around every facet of American life. The economy lets, the savings sector suffers, the credit sector suffers, and the employment sector suffers. The current aspects of the American health care system are alarming and bring to be addressed or it is predicted that dire consequences could develop, which will lead to a kick downstairs understanding and acceptance of universal health care. Callahan predicts:(1) movement at the state level; (2) business dismay at the cost of providing care and the resultant steady reductions of employer -provided coverage and benefits; (3) the persistently growing number of uninsured; (4) the alarming rate of health care costs well exceeding general cost of living increases (projected at 7- 8 percent a year for the foreseeable future); (5) increasing middle-class out of pocket payments take down with present insurance coverage, and rising economic insecurities as they face a disintegrating mental picture; and (6) perhaps a change of attitude toward universal care among physicians, much as once happened with Canadian doctors. (2006, p. 28) match to Callahan’s facts and predictions, the United States is in need of an extensive health care overhaul. Without proper addressing of the current situation, the average American patient will suffer through continually rising health care costs and health care coverage. The change to a universal system will not be easy because many in the medical checkup field do not want universal health care coverage.Callahan has stated that durin g Canada’s attempt at socialized euphony, American members of the medical community enlisted propaganda and other forms of persuasion in an attempt to cause Canada to deny any form of universal coverage and these attempts failed. (2006, p. 28) The United States medical community understood that socialized medicine would cause a mathematical lowering of stipend and rates as well as an increase in patients, which they did not want. If Canada’s system was implemented and succeeded, then possibly the American public would execute the benefits and would want universal coverage as well. The American medical elite identified this possibility and have been compacting the change ever since. Accompanying this fight has been the American Medical Association (AMA), which initially found the attempts at making the Canadian system fail.Currently, the AMA has proposed a health care plan that does not even address the idea of universal coverage, and the group is a major politic al and public force in America with a lot of leverage to bring public policy. (2006, p. 28) The end result is a large organization that is supposedly watching out for patients, but at the same time is eliminating any pillowcase of universal health care opportunities. The American system allows groups such as the AMA to control public policy, which does not even recognize what the American public wants in health care. Callahan has stated that well over 60% of Americans would be in favor of universal health care in some form, yet the AMA ignores this need and continues to cater to the medical elite in America. (2006, p.29) If the AMA remain in control over medical public policy then energy will ever get done to address the increasing need for American medical reform. The proper reformation of the health care system lies in universal health care, and Canada’s system is a prime example of health care effectiveness. A look into the literal facts surrounding America’s c urrent health care position is beneficial into discovering the current state of the country. The facts about America’s system are shocking when put into perspective with other countries in the world. The World Health Organization puts America at number 37 overall in health care performance, which is in between the two countries costa Rica and Slovenia. (Lesnik, 2004, p.1) Out of all the industrialized countries, America is fall behind way behind many of the top countries in the world, and it appears that this rank will continue to plummet if nothing is done to alleviate the health care crisis. The ranking of America is a strange outcome for the country because America spends more than any country in health care services. According to Lesnik, In 2004, U. S. health spending rose to a whopping 15 percent of the gross domestic product, a high percentage than any other nation, including those that provide universal coverage to all residents and those with much more little Gros s Domestic Products. (2004, p. 1) Lesnik’s figures present a dire circumstance for America. The American medical field has more expenditures than countries that already provide universal coverage, which includes Canada.If the expenditures are so high, it would make sense that America should have the best medical coverage of any nation in the world, but this is not the case. The idea as to why the United States ranked so low can be summed up with one idea and that is access to care. The numbers involved in a neediness of access show further harms the pervert to the livelihood of Americans as well as the economic well being of the country. Illness affects every person and does not discriminate match to wealth or ability, which causes many citizens in the economic sectors of the country to lower their productivity because they do not have adequate access to care. (Lesnik, 2004, p. 1) This can cause a offload in growth in America, which will further exacerbate the situation.Fu ndamentally, if the economy falters then the ability of sick workers to pay for care diminishes, which increases the problem of access. Lesnik identifies the fact that tens of millions of Americans lack a doctor to call on if they are in pain or a medical facility that will accept them when they are sick. (2004, p. 1) Lesnik states, According to the U. S. Census Bureau, a staggering 45 million Americansâ€or 15. 6 percent of the populationâ€permanently live without any form of health insurance. This creates serious barriers to care, which lead to unnecessary illness and death. It is increasingly clear that, for individuals and their families, the financial burden of medical expenses is unmanageable without insurance. (2004, p. 1)It appears that the major problem affecting the US health care crisis is access to care. Access to care encompasses the ability to pay as well as suitable facilities in which to receive care. These are the main culprits in America’s health care s hortcomings, and if not addressed will only become worse. One of the possible reasons that America has shied away from universal health care is the enactment of law in the 1960s. In 1965, the American legislature enacted the Medicare program, and many experts noted that this piece of legislation may open the door for universal health care. (Callahan, 2006, p. 29) Obviously this never happened, and America has maintained the stance quo since.Another side effect of the Medicare program is that it had extreme costs to the government, which Callahan believes has caused many within government to shun any sort of grand expenditure such as universal health care. (2006, p. 29) The battle between whether small implementation or extreme implementation of a socialized health care system is unavoidable has been at the forefront of the health care debate. many a(prenominal) experts believe small increments in the government’s socialization will be beneficial, but Callahan suggests tha t according to Canada’s model only a grand implementation will solve the health care problem and small increments will do little to alleviate the crisis that is occurring right now. (2006, p. 29) According to Callahan, America need a major overhaul and needs to look north to Canada for the ideal health care system.It appears that without this major change, America’s health care crisis will continue to grow to astronomical proportions. The American health care system is in a crisis and needs a change. Canada’s system appears to be better for the patient. A study into Canada’s system is essential in understanding how the policies would affect the United States. mop up The success of the Canadian universal health care system demonstrates how America should switch to a universal-style system as soon as possible. The deteriorating state of the health care system in America illustrates how the American free-enterprise system does not work and does not provid e adequate care, access, and lower costs.References Armstrong, P. , Armstrong, H. , & Fegan, C. (1998, June). The silk hat Solution: Questions and Answers on the Canadian Health supervise System. Washington Monthly, 30, 8+. Callahan, D. (2006). Universal Health portion out: From the States to the Nation?. The Hastings Center Report, 36(5), 28+. Krasny, J. (1992, February 17). The maltreat Health- do by Model. Is Canadas Health-Care System Really Cheaper?. National Review, 44, 43+. Lesnik, J. (2004). club Health Centers: Health Care as It Could Be. daybook of Law and Health, 19(1), 1+. Looking to Canada for Health Care Reform. (2006, July). USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), 135, 8.\r\n'