Comparing Housman's and Updike's poems that have two totally different attitudes toward athletes.

In A.E. Housmans poem To an Athletes Dying Young and John Updikes poem Ex- hoops Player, each of the speakers use two different types of attitudes toward the athletes. In A.E. Housmans poem, his sort of thinking about the athlete is negative.

Smart lad, to slip betimes away

From field where glory does non stay

And early though the laurel grows

It shrivel quicker than the rose. (955)

The author expresses that the death of this young athlete fleck he was famous was better than growing old and go through losing it.

So set, before its echoes fade,

The fleet foot on the sill of shade,

And aim to the low lintel up

The still- defended challenge-cup.(955)

To die famous is better than dying(p) a nobody which many athletes end up doing.

On the early(a) hand John Updikes state of mind toward athletes is sad.

He was good: in fact, the best. In 46

He bucketed three hundred ninety points,A county record still. The be loved interchange. (1)

The author shows that Flick was so great at one point in his life, so good that Flick never though of learning new skills because he would not need them to play basketball.

He never learned a trade, he just sells gas,

Checks oil, and changes flats. Once in a while,

As a gag, he dribbles an inner tube,

But most of us remember anyway.(1)

Now Flicks life is energy more than endless job of doing crap. Basketball was not a career that never ended because it does end once somebody better or young comes along to take a place of an older player. The author revels the haunting truth that you faecal matter not be the best forever.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper