Analysis of our Speech Class

During the first week of phratry the professor gave an in class assignment. Students were achieven 5 present moments to prepare a 1-2 minute impromptu speech identifying an issue of importance to m both and a how the issue links to the speaker personally. Bashar verbalize about how weak the vex to get people to riding habit condoms. Basher thought that the campaign was lame because condoms hadnt been successful at preventing his girlfriend from getting pregnant. Basher also made the statement that that he tangle that condoms were non whatever better at guarding against AIDS or whatever other sexually transmitted diseases.

Julie spoke about fleshly rights Julie said that she was against terrible test and inhumane conditions for animals. Julie also matte that animal activist went overboard with protesting. Julie cited a time when her get d give had blood thrown on her fur coat.

Bud spoke about gun control. Bud mat that no matte how tough gun controls were it would not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. Bud felt that guns laws infringe on Constutional laws.

The professor asked from comments on the speeches given. Naro commented that he felt uncomfortable when Bashars speech about the use of condoms. Gretchen commented that the use of the word lame offended her. Kate praised the speakers for not being white-lipped to talking about unpopular topics.

The problems with this case is that the students were assigned to give an impromptu speech on identifying an issue of importance to more and a how the issue links to the speaker personally. It seemed as if any issue that was afflicting the speaker in someway offended soul in the audience.

Each speaker identified an issue of its own personal importance. Many of the impromptu speeches did not have any importance to the audience. Many of the audience members...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper